August 4, 2006

N.J. Home Child Care Workers Get Their Union

CWA Local 1037 has helped more than 6,000 home child care providers in New Jersey get a union voice. 

Day care workers were on hand as Gov. Jon Corzine signed the executive order this week that gives them the right to organize and bargain collectively. The campaign, carried out with AFSCME, means that child care workers now will be able to negotiate over wages — the payments they receive for caring for children in their homes under the state-certified program.

Local 1037 activists and other supporters knocked on thousands of doors in a campaign done entirely through house visits. The local also has built a "neighborhood shop steward" program of activists throughout the state, said local President Hetty Rosenstein.

During the campaign, family care providers built a strong organization, and rallied and met with the governor to press for bargaining rights. At the signing, Corzine recognized "the invaluable and essential service to working parents and guardians" that the state's family care workers provide. The child care providers earn about $99 to $105 per week per child for providing care in their homes to other parents receiving welfare assistance — "unbelievably low wages," Rosenstein said.

Rosenstein and her local were recognized at last month's CWA convention with the President's Annual Award for leading the campaign.

The local also thanked activists from Locals 1031, 1034 and 1079, and ACORN — the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now — for their support.  

AFA-CWA Defends Right to Strike at Northwest

AFA-CWA gave Northwest Airlines notice of intent to exercise their right to strike, bringing "CHAOS" to the company as early as August 15. And next week the union will defend that right before a bankruptcy judge in New York.

The union threatened strike action immediately after the airline on July 31 imposed terms of a tentative contract, negotiated by the employees' former union and approved by the bankruptcy court, which slashes wages and benefits for the 9,200 flight attendants by about 40 percent. The workers earlier had rejected that tentative settlement by a vote of more than 80 percent.

After AFA-CWA won an election to represent the unit on July 6, the union negotiated improvements in the prior settlement, but was hamstrung by the bankruptcy court's mandate for concessions totaling $195 million per year. Workers voted down the second tentative contract by a 55 to 45 percent margin.

"Our members have spoken. These drastic cuts to our pay, benefits and work rules are simply unacceptable," said Mollie Reiley, AFA-CWA interim master executive council president at Northwest.

The union is seeking to resume talks and negotiate a new settlement, but Northwest's only response so far has been to file suit to try to block the flight attendants from exercising their right to strike.

AFA-CWA maintains that labor law governing the airline industry is clear — if an employer unilaterally changes contract terms, workers can strike. "It's America. No one has to come to work for terms they didn't agree to," AFA-CWA's General Counsel David Borer told the St. Paul Pioneer Press.

Dems Stop GOP from Playing Games with America's Poorest Workers

Senate Democrats this week refused to cave in to a Republican scheme that would have increased the minimum wage for some workers but only by tying their miniscule raise to a repeal of the estate tax for America's richest families.

Republicans thought themselves so clever that some even boasted to reporters that they had put their opponents in a box: Vote with us or be prepared for campaign ads claiming Democrats rejected a minimum wage hike.

But Democrats stood firm, heeding the calls of the AFL-CIO and newspapers across the country. "So it's crumbs for the working poor and a bonanza for the children of the superrich," said the Des Moines Register. "This is the House Republicans' idea of a fair and balanced bill? Could they possibly be more out of touch with the struggles of ordinary Americans?"

The Senate never voted on the bill itself. Instead, the Democrats' solidarity kept the bill from getting the necessary 60 votes to cut off debate Thursday before senators left for summer vacation.

The bill would have raised the minimum wage from $5.15 an hour to $7.25 an hour over three years but it would have excluded millions of workers who rely on tips for part of their wages.

The so-called "Tipped Wage Fairness" provision would have invalidated state laws that require employers to pay the minimum wage regardless of a worker's tips. Currently, Alaska, California, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington have such laws on the books.

Combining a repeal of the estate tax with such a provisions meant that "under the Republican bill, Paris Hilton and her family will get $250 million, while the tipped workers in Hilton hotels will lose up to $5.50 an hour," Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass) said.

Even with the estate tax repeal for the super rich, a minimum wage increase was distasteful to many Republicans, who have voted down nine proposed increases in the last decade while raising their own salaries by $31,000.

"There's a general agreement among Republicans (opposing the raise) that, 'maybe we don't like it much but we need to move forward with it just for political reasons,'" Rep. Mike Castle (R-Del.) admitted in a CBS interview.

GOP: Wal-Mart Lawyer 'Highly Qualified' for Labor Post

One more fox is headed to the henhouse as Senate Republicans get ready to rubberstamp another anti-worker candidate chosen by President Bush for a position in the Labor Department.

At his hearing this week, Paul DeCamp portrayed himself as someone who'd stocked shelves and flipped burgers and therefore was ideal to be in charge of the Wage and Hour Administration, enforcing the nation's minimum wage and overtime laws, and many other worker issues.

In truth, DeCamp admitted that as a lawyer in private practice he never represented the workers' side in a lawsuit. In fact, he represented Wal-Mart in trying to prevent a class action by 1.5 million women suing the company for pay and promotion discrimination.

DeCamp, now a senior policy advisor in the Labor Department, has also proposed draconian overhauls of overtime rights, represented businesses fighting union organizing campaigns and fought for employers against the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, state wage and hour laws and other laws protecting workers and retirees, according to the AFL-CIO.

IN BRIEF:

  • There's the boss who tried to force a part-timer to work full-time while the employee's mother was dying and the company that not only charged a worker for her desk chair, it billed her $200 for the flowers it sent when her father died. It almost makes the boss who barks and makes barnyard noises seem benign.

    Those are three of the finalists in the Working America "Bad Boss" contest. There's also a dentist who docked his workers' pay after September 11 because patients cancelled appointments. And a boss who shrugged off a worker's trauma when her patient — an Iraq war veteran — killed himself. "I don't know why she had to take the day off," the boss told the worker's supervisor. "People commit suicide every day."

    Read them all and vote for the worst at http://www.workingamerica.org/. The winner will get an all-expense paid trip away from his or her very bad boss.

     
  • Union leaders at the Environmental Protection Agency say management is bending to political pressure and ignoring its scientists' warnings about toxic chemicals that may be approved for agricultural pesticides.

    A letter to the agency director, signed by leaders of nine unions representing 9,000 EPA scientists and staff around the country, said that workers believe that that under EPA management, "the concerns of agriculture and the pesticide industry come before our responsibility to protect the health of our nation's citizens."

    It's not the first time union leaders at the EPA and other federal agencies have spoken out against harmful policies. "More and more, the unions are coming together to confront the agency's unwillingness to make the appropriate use of science to show risks to public health and the environment," EPA scientist and union leader William Hirzy said, quoted by the Times.